About your Search

20121121
20121129
Search Results 0 to 2 of about 3 (some duplicates have been removed)
is for a clean, wedomestic energy future that puts us in control. our abundant natural gas is already saving us money, producing cleaner electricity, putting us to work here in america and supporting wind and solar. though all energy development comes with some risk, we're committed to safely and responsibly producing natural gas. it's not a dream. america's natural gas... putting us in control of our energy future, now. >>> in the spotlight tonight, bush 3.0. jeb bush met yesterday with a group of his former staffers at a hotel just steps away from the white house and refused to answer questions about a possible presidential run in 2016. in an interswru online, bush did not rule out a presidential run. he simply said that quote, i am here to catch up with folks and promote education reform. and today, on the day that gq crowned mitt romney the number one least influential person of the year, jeb bush hosted a national summit on education reform in washington. exactly the kind of thing presidential candidates do at this stage leading up to the xul announcement of their candidacy. yesterday, chr
is to embarrass the administration, to destroy the energy of government, and to substitute the pleasure of an insignificant turbulent or corrupt hunta to the regular deliberations and decisions of a respectable majority. does any of that sound familiar, kind of like what we have been seeing in recent years maybe? the founders by the way also opposed political parties. they didn't want them. they couldn't have foreseen how highly disciplined parties would subvert and remake the system they designed and use rules like the filibuster that didn't even, exist back then to what is the line, destroy the energy of government and substitute the pleasure, caprice to the regular decisions of the respectable majority. i love alexander hamilton. forcing senators to talk when the filibuster doesn't do anything about that problem, and that means it doesn't do anything about the central problem that keeps real majority from governing today. we can't have a political system in which even when the american people vote twice in a row to give one party the power to pursue its agenda, the minority is still
Search Results 0 to 2 of about 3 (some duplicates have been removed)